Advertisment

What is the MotoGP Holeshot Device and How does it improve starts? – Explained

Learn about the MotoGP Holeshot Device, how it enhances race starts by improving acceleration and stability, and why it's become crucial for competitive riders.

author-image
Shubham Shekhar
New Update
MotoGP Holeshot Device

MotoGP Holeshot Device (Source: X)

Listen to this article
0.75x 1x 1.5x
00:00 / 00:00

In the fast-paced world of MotoGP, where every split-second counts, technology plays a critical role in giving riders a competitive edge. One such innovation is the Holeshot Device, a system designed to improve a rider's start by preventing the front wheel from lifting during acceleration.

However, the introduction of ride-height devices like the Holeshot has sparked controversy, leading to a ban on some versions from 2023, and a complete ban on all ride-height devices by 2027. To understand the debate, let’s dive into how these devices work and why they’re so polarizing.

What is the Holeshot Device?

Originally inspired by motocross technology, the Holeshot Device was first introduced to MotoGP by Ducati in 2018. It works by locking the bike’s front forks in a compressed position as the rider approaches the grid, allowing the rider to maintain a lower centre of gravity during acceleration.

This prevents the front wheel from lifting, or "wheelieing," which is common during rapid acceleration in low gears, particularly at the race start. Once the bike reaches the first corner and the rider brakes, the device disengages, and the bike resumes its normal operation.

Unlike the traditional ride height devices used during racing, the Holeshot Device offers no advantage beyond the initial race start. Its simplicity lies in its one-time use, aimed specifically at enhancing acceleration from the start line without adding much complexity during the race itself.

Evolution into Rear Ride Height Devices

The innovation didn’t stop at the front forks. In 2019, Ducati and other manufacturers began developing rear-ride height devices that could be engaged mid-race. By lowering the bike’s rear during braking or acceleration out of corners, these devices improve stability and traction, giving riders an advantage in tight racing situations.

This sparked a technological arms race among MotoGP teams, with every manufacturer, including Suzuki, implementing both front and rear ride height systems by 2021. The most significant evolution came in 2022 when Ducati developed a repeatable front ride height device, which could be engaged during the race.

Unlike the Holeshot, this system could be used multiple times, allowing for strategic deployment based on track conditions and rider needs. While the device must still be manually activated by the rider, its repeatability during the race gave Ducati a competitive edge.

Also Read: What is a MotoGP Triple Crown and Why does it matter? – Explained

The Downsides: Weight, Complexity, and Risk

However, these devices bring their own set of challenges. For starters, they add weight to the bike—something no MotoGP rider wants. In a sport where tenths of a second make the difference between victory and defeat, the added mass of ride height devices forces teams to weigh the potential benefits against the cost of reduced speed and handling.

There’s also the issue of reliability. These devices can malfunction, causing bikes to jerk unpredictably, potentially leading to crashes or retirements. Riders have reported the systems getting stuck in their engaged positions, turning their MotoGP bikes into drag racers, as seen in a recent incident at the German Grand Prix. These malfunctions have reignited debates over whether the risks outweigh the advantages.

The Future of Ride Height Devices in MotoGP

Given these concerns, the Grand Prix Commission has decided to ban front ride height devices from 2023, though rear devices remain legal for now. By 2027, all ride-height devices, including the Holeshot, will be prohibited. This decision has divided fans and riders, with some feeling that these devices make racing less exciting by reducing the spectacle of wheelies and slipstream overtakes.

While the devices offer a clear advantage in terms of performance, some argue that they detract from the thrill of the sport. The debate highlights a broader tension between technological advancement and preserving the raw, visceral excitement that has long been the hallmark of MotoGP.

With both sides presenting compelling arguments, the future of MotoGP remains uncertain—will the ban lead to a resurgence of traditional racing action, or are we witnessing the inevitable evolution of the sport? Only time will tell.

MOTOGP
Advertisment